Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lindsey Norman's avatar

I am interested to see how - what I’m assuming will be - a personal awareness of IFS, clarifies the intentions and protections of the human heart. When I went to school to become a therapist, I thought I would learn how to help people. I never imagined the depth of character work and soul-searching that would be required to live authentically. Thank you for openly processing your own internal work. I’m looking forward to seeing how your personal application and introspection impacts my own journey, and also helps me love others well, empowering them in the present moment. I appreciate your transparency.

Expand full comment
JC Cloe's avatar

Maybe I'm being too analytical. I'm just in "editor" mode, considering the language of this ad and how it might be received by potential readers. I am excited about what is to follow of course.

1. The past tense in the first sentence almost makes is sound like it's gone. Like, "Kelly WAS a father, and WAS a successful psychologist " makes it sound like history that is done, like maybe he is no longer a father/husband and no longer a psychologist. I'm not sure how I might reword it at the moment but perhaps a little different build up saying you "got to" this place, a place of generally accepted and measurable success but found yourself suffering from depression or whatever phrasing works here. If the depression and anxiety are "gone" gone then I can see where this wording came from but unless you want that past to fade into non existence, perhaps there could be use for something that indicates how you carry the past with you, how you are not forgetting it or something. I'm just thinking of the message from Elijah where the past isn't really ever over or done, but part of who we are.

2. I get the need to be brief and to pop with some kind of shock or hook like a "psychologist with depression" and an "apocalyptic morning on a Marine base" but the first paragraph hits you with the first one then explains away the hook with the experiment and the year of discovery commentary. Then the second paragraph which may or may not have people still reading at that point has this larger hook with the whole apocalypse thing seems like it just wasn't soon enough. Again...I don't know how I would go after what I'm saying, but I think there could be some cutting and some reordering of the hooks and shocks that engage interest in readers.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts